VerfassungsgeschichteVerfassungsvergleichVerfassungsrechtRechtsphilosophie
ÜbersichtWho-is-WhoBundesgerichtBundesverfassungsgerichtVolltextsuche...

Informationen zum Dokument  EGMR 22414/93 - Chahal v. The United Kingdom  Materielle Begründung

1. Bearbeitung

2. Abruf & Rang

3. Zitiert durch:

4. Zitiert selbst:

5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur:

    [nicht verfügbar]
7. Markierte Gliederung:

I. The Circumstances of the Case
A. The applicants
B. Background: the conflict in Punjab
C. Mr Chahal's visit to India in 1984
D. Mr Chahal's political and religious activities in the United Kingdom
E. Mr Chahal's alleged criminal activities
F. The deportation and asylum proceedings
1. The notice of intention to deport  ...
2. Mr Chahal's application for asylum  ...
(a) his detention and torture in Punjab in 1984 (see paragraph 18 ...
(b) his political activities in the United Kingdom and his identi ...
(c) his links with Sant Bhindranwale and Jasbir Singh Rode; (see  ...
(d) evidence that his parents, other relatives and contacts had b ...
(e) the interest shown by the Indian national press in his allege ...
(f) consistent evidence, including that contained in the reports  ...
3. The advisory panel ...
4. Judicial review  ...
G. Current conditions in India and in Punjab
1. Material submitted by the Government  ...
2. The Indian National Human Rights Commission reports  ...
3. Reports to the United Nations  ...
4. The United States' Department of State reports  ...
5. The Immigration Appeal Tribunal  ...
6. The reports of Amnesty International  ...
II. Relevant Domestic and International Law and Practice
A. Deportation
B. Appeal against deportation and the advisory panel procedure
C. The United Nations 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees
D. Detention pending deportation
E. Judicial review
I. Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention (art. 3)
A. Applicability of Article 3 (art. 3) in expulsion cases
B. Expulsion cases involving an alleged danger to national security
C. Application of Article 3 (art. 3) in the circumstances of the case
1. The point of time for the assessment of the risk  ...
2. The assessment of the risk of ill-treatment  ...
(a) The arguments  ...
(i) General conditions  ...
(ii) Factors specific to Mr Chahal  ...
(b) The Court's approach  ...
II. Alleged Violations of Article 5 of the Convention (art. 5)
A. Article 5 para. 1 (art. 5-1)
B. Article 5 para. 4 (art. 5-4)
III. Alleged Violation of Article 8 of the Convention (art. 8)
IV. Alleged Violation of Article 13 of the Convention (art. 13)
V. Application of Article 50 of the Convention (art. 50)
A. Non-pecuniary damage
B. Legal costs and expenses
C. Default interest
I. The deportation order
A. Article 3 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3 (art. 3, art. 13+3)
B. Article 8 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 8, art. 13+8)
II. The first applicant's detention
A. Article 5 para. 1 (art. 5-1)
B. Article 5 para. 4 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 5 (art. 5-4, art. 13+5)

Bearbeitung, zuletzt am 02.05.2024, durch: Sibylle Perler, A. Tschentscher
© 1994-2024 Das Fallrecht (DFR).