1. Bearbeitung Texterfassung:  Michelle Ammann Formatierung:  Michelle Ammann Revision:  A. Tschentscher 2. Abruf & Rang Abrufen:  RTF-Version RTF mit Seiten RTF mit Linien Druckversion Druck mit Seiten Rspr.:   0% (128) Lit.:   0% (92) Suche:   0% (516) Rang:   0% (656) 3. Zitiert durch: 4. Zitiert selbst: 5. Besprechungen:

6. Zitiert in Literatur: [nicht verfügbar] 7. Markierte Gliederung: I. The Circumstances of the Case A. Background to the case B. Federal Court judgment of 14 November 2007 C. Developments subsequent to the Federal Court's judgment D. Efforts made to improve the sanctions regime II. Relevant Domestic and International Law and Practice A. Domestic Law 1. Federal Constitution ... 2. Ordinance of 2 October 2000 instituting measures against perso ... B. International Law 1. United Nations Charter ... 2. Resolutions adopted by the Security Council in connection with ... 3. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) ... 4. Work of the United Nations International Law Commission ... 5. Relevant international case-law ... (a)  The case of Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat I ... (b)  The case of Sayadi and Vinck v. Belgium (United Na ... 6. Relevant case-law of other States ... (a)  The case of Ahmed and others v. HM Treasury (Unite ... (b)  The case of Abdelrazik v. Canada (Minister of Fore ... I. The Government's perliminary Objections A. Compatibility of the complaints with the Convention and Protocols thereto 1. The parties' submissions ... (a)  The respondent Government ... (b)  The applicant ... 2. Submissions of third-party interveners ... (a)  The French Government ... (b)  The United Kingdom Government ... (c)  JUSTICE ... 3. The Court's assessment ... (a)  Compatibility ratione personae ... (b)  Compatibility ratione materiae ... B. Whether the applicant is a "victim" 1. The parties' submissions ... 2. The Court's assessment ... C. Whether domestic remedies have been exhausted 1. The parties' submissions ... (a)  The respondent Government ... (b)  The applicant ... 2. The Court's assessment ... II. Alleged Violation of Article 8 of the Convention A. Admissibility B. Merits 1. The parties' submissions ... (a)  The applicant ... (b)  The respondent Government ... 2. The Court's assessment ... (a)  Whether there has been an interference ... (b)  Whether the interference was justified ... (i)  General principles ... (ii)  Legal basis ... (iii)  Legitimate aim ... (iv)  "Necessary in a democratic society" ... alpha)  Implementation of Security Council resolutions ... beta)  Whether the interference was proportionate in th ... gamma)  Conclusion ... III. Alleged Violation of Article 13 of the Convention A. Admissibility B. Merits 1. The parties' submissions ... (a)  The applicant ... (b)  The respondent Government ... 2. The Court's assessment ... (a)  Applicable principles ... (b)  Application of those principles to the present cas ... IV. Alleged Violations of Article 5 of the Convention 1. Submissions of the parties and third-party interveners ... (a)  The Government ... (b)  The applicant ... (c)  The French Government ... 2. The Court's assessment ... V. Other Alleged Violations of the Convention VI. Application of Article 41 of the Convention A. Damage B. Costs and expenses